<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1488 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195935</link>
    <description>The appeal was successful as the court set aside the Order-in-Original and Order-in-Appeal, allowing all three appeals. The court found discrepancies in the statement recorded from one of the appellants, raising doubts about the accuracy of the figures used as evidence in the show cause notice. The manipulations in the statement led to concerns about the sustainability of the notice, ultimately resulting in the decision to overturn the penalties imposed by the Original Authority and upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 08:33:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1488 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195935</link>
      <description>The appeal was successful as the court set aside the Order-in-Original and Order-in-Appeal, allowing all three appeals. The court found discrepancies in the statement recorded from one of the appellants, raising doubts about the accuracy of the figures used as evidence in the show cause notice. The manipulations in the statement led to concerns about the sustainability of the notice, ultimately resulting in the decision to overturn the penalties imposed by the Original Authority and upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>