<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1728 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195952</link>
    <description>The court quashed the show cause notice, directed the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue work as per the contract, and consider extending the completion period by six months. Timely payment of running bills was mandated to ensure no hindrance in work completion. The petition was allowed with no cost order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 08:33:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1728 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195952</link>
      <description>The court quashed the show cause notice, directed the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue work as per the contract, and consider extending the completion period by six months. Timely payment of running bills was mandated to ensure no hindrance in work completion. The petition was allowed with no cost order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>