<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1130 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195956</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court granted leave after condoning the delay in the case of . The petitioner was represented by Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv., Mr. Satyam Sethi, Adv., Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv., Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, AG, Ms. Rajni Ohri Adv., Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Adv.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 08:33:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1130 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195956</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court granted leave after condoning the delay in the case of . The petitioner was represented by Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv., Mr. Satyam Sethi, Adv., Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv., Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, AG, Ms. Rajni Ohri Adv., Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Adv.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>