<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1299 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195941</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the applicability of Section 50C to the sale of depreciable assets but directed the AO to apply the long-term capital gains tax rate for assets held over three years. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the charging of interest under Section 220(2), aligning with the CBDT Circular and relevant case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 08:33:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1299 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195941</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the applicability of Section 50C to the sale of depreciable assets but directed the AO to apply the long-term capital gains tax rate for assets held over three years. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the charging of interest under Section 220(2), aligning with the CBDT Circular and relevant case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>