<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 744 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350865</link>
    <description>The document addresses whether the proviso to Section 19(2) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 applies to manufacturers as well as registered dealers, and whether interim protection should follow pending further adjudication. The Madras High Court admitted the writ appeal and granted interim stay of the impugned judgment, keeping the lower court decision in abeyance until the appeal is decided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 08:33:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 744 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350865</link>
      <description>The document addresses whether the proviso to Section 19(2) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 applies to manufacturers as well as registered dealers, and whether interim protection should follow pending further adjudication. The Madras High Court admitted the writ appeal and granted interim stay of the impugned judgment, keeping the lower court decision in abeyance until the appeal is decided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>