https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195926 Regulatory provisions governing minority educational institutions may validly ensure fair service conditions and discipline, but a blanket prior-approval requirement for dismissal, removal or reduction in rank was treated as impermissible because it intruded on the core right of administration. Chapter IV was otherwise upheld as enforceable, while Section 12 was read down only to preserve that exclusion for minority schools. Separately, a major penalty order was vitiated where the disciplinary authority failed to meaningfully consider the employee's reply and give a reasoned decision. The removal was set aside, a lesser punishment substituted, and back wages restricted. en-us Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:34:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195926 Regulatory provisions governing minority educational institutions may validly ensure fair service conditions and discipline, but a blanket prior-approval requirement for dismissal, removal or reduction in rank was treated as impermissible because it intruded on the core right of administration. Chapter IV was otherwise upheld as enforceable, while Section 12 was read down only to preserve that exclusion for minority schools. Separately, a major penalty order was vitiated where the disciplinary authority failed to meaningfully consider the employee's reply and give a reasoned decision. The removal was set aside, a lesser punishment substituted, and back wages restricted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195926