<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 830 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195919</link>
    <description>The Court approved the Scheme of Amalgamation between Anu Trading Private Limited and Shinano Retail Private Limited, subject to conditions to protect tax liabilities and public interest. Despite objections by the Income Tax Department alleging tax evasion, the Court found the Scheme legally permissible. Emphasizing compliance with statutory requirements and public policy, the Court sanctioned the Scheme, part of a larger group restructuring. Specific conditions were imposed, including restrictions on book disposal and continuation of legal proceedings. The transferor Company was directed to cover costs, and the petitioner Company was dissolved without winding up.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 16:12:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 830 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195919</link>
      <description>The Court approved the Scheme of Amalgamation between Anu Trading Private Limited and Shinano Retail Private Limited, subject to conditions to protect tax liabilities and public interest. Despite objections by the Income Tax Department alleging tax evasion, the Court found the Scheme legally permissible. Emphasizing compliance with statutory requirements and public policy, the Court sanctioned the Scheme, part of a larger group restructuring. Specific conditions were imposed, including restrictions on book disposal and continuation of legal proceedings. The transferor Company was directed to cover costs, and the petitioner Company was dissolved without winding up.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>