https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195912 The court granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving allegations of non-compliance with Section 50 of the NDPS Act, coercion in obtaining a statement under Section 67, and procedural irregularities by the DRI. The court found that the petitioner had given consent for the search, the statement lacked corroborative evidence, and doubts existed regarding the petitioner's conscious possession of heroin. The court allowed the bail application, requiring the petitioner to furnish a personal bond and comply with specified conditions, based on the belief that he was not guilty and unlikely to commit offenses while on bail. en-us Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Nov 2017 14:13:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195912 The court granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving allegations of non-compliance with Section 50 of the NDPS Act, coercion in obtaining a statement under Section 67, and procedural irregularities by the DRI. The court found that the petitioner had given consent for the search, the statement lacked corroborative evidence, and doubts existed regarding the petitioner's conscious possession of heroin. The court allowed the bail application, requiring the petitioner to furnish a personal bond and comply with specified conditions, based on the belief that he was not guilty and unlikely to commit offenses while on bail. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195912