https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195911 A joint writ petition was treated as maintainable where the petitioners' claims arose from the same transaction, involved common questions of law and fact, and the relief was severable, so the proceeding was not defeated merely because some petitioners were said to be disentitled to relief. In relation to empanelled primary teachers included in the 1973 panel, the Court held that one panel prepared from two lists was not converted into separate panels merely by that structure, and the employer could not later dispute the panel's validity or the candidates' entitlement after acting on it by appointing them in deputation vacancies. The challenge to absorption in permanent vacancies was rejected, and the directions for consideration and absorption were sustained. en-us Wed, 10 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Nov 2017 14:12:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195911 A joint writ petition was treated as maintainable where the petitioners' claims arose from the same transaction, involved common questions of law and fact, and the relief was severable, so the proceeding was not defeated merely because some petitioners were said to be disentitled to relief. In relation to empanelled primary teachers included in the 1973 panel, the Court held that one panel prepared from two lists was not converted into separate panels merely by that structure, and the employer could not later dispute the panel's validity or the candidates' entitlement after acting on it by appointing them in deputation vacancies. The challenge to absorption in permanent vacancies was rejected, and the directions for consideration and absorption were sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195911