<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 770 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195910</link>
    <description>The court addressed objections regarding the maintainability of the writ petition and validity of supplementary affidavits, allowing the petitioner to rectify defects within a specified period, failing which the petition would be dismissed. The court emphasized procedural adherence and granted the petitioner an opportunity to correct identified issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:12:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 770 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195910</link>
      <description>The court addressed objections regarding the maintainability of the writ petition and validity of supplementary affidavits, allowing the petitioner to rectify defects within a specified period, failing which the petition would be dismissed. The court emphasized procedural adherence and granted the petitioner an opportunity to correct identified issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>