<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (3) TMI 258 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195909</link>
    <description>Writ Rules may validly incorporate the Code of Civil Procedure for Article 226 proceedings where no specific writ-rule provision exists and the incorporated procedure is not inconsistent with those rules. Accordingly, Order 22 governs substitution of legal representatives following a party&#039;s death, although the Limitation Act does not apply to writ petitions or incidental applications because writ proceedings are not suits and no writ-rule provision incorporates that Act. Order 23 Rule 1 also applies: withdrawal of a writ petition without permission to file afresh bars a second petition based on the same facts and cause of action, preserving finality and preventing abuse of process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:01:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (3) TMI 258 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195909</link>
      <description>Writ Rules may validly incorporate the Code of Civil Procedure for Article 226 proceedings where no specific writ-rule provision exists and the incorporated procedure is not inconsistent with those rules. Accordingly, Order 22 governs substitution of legal representatives following a party&#039;s death, although the Limitation Act does not apply to writ petitions or incidental applications because writ proceedings are not suits and no writ-rule provision incorporates that Act. Order 23 Rule 1 also applies: withdrawal of a writ petition without permission to file afresh bars a second petition based on the same facts and cause of action, preserving finality and preventing abuse of process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>