https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195909 The Court held that Civil Procedure Code (CPC) provisions apply to writ proceedings to the extent necessary and not inconsistent with the Writ Rules. Orders 22 and 23 Rule 1 of CPC are applicable to writ proceedings, preventing abuse of court process. The Explanation to Section 141 of CPC clarifies that writ proceedings are special. Res judicata principles apply, barring subsequent petitions on the same cause of action. The Limitation Act does not apply to writ proceedings. The Court dismissed the petition based on res judicata, as the earlier petition was dismissed without permission for a fresh petition. en-us Mon, 16 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:01:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195909 The Court held that Civil Procedure Code (CPC) provisions apply to writ proceedings to the extent necessary and not inconsistent with the Writ Rules. Orders 22 and 23 Rule 1 of CPC are applicable to writ proceedings, preventing abuse of court process. The Explanation to Section 141 of CPC clarifies that writ proceedings are special. Res judicata principles apply, barring subsequent petitions on the same cause of action. The Limitation Act does not apply to writ proceedings. The Court dismissed the petition based on res judicata, as the earlier petition was dismissed without permission for a fresh petition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195909