https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195909 Where the Writ Rules are silent, Rule 32 incorporates the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 into Article 226 proceedings so far as it is not inconsistent with those rules. On that basis, Order 22 is treated as applicable to writ matters, including substitution of legal representatives, while the Limitation Act is not extended to writ petitions or incidental applications because writ proceedings are not suits and no rule makes it applicable. The note also states that withdrawal of a writ petition without liberty to refile attracts the principle in Order 23 Rule 1, so a second petition on the same cause of action is barred. The overall procedural framework therefore favours finality and prevents repeated writ filings. en-us Mon, 16 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:01:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195909 Where the Writ Rules are silent, Rule 32 incorporates the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 into Article 226 proceedings so far as it is not inconsistent with those rules. On that basis, Order 22 is treated as applicable to writ matters, including substitution of legal representatives, while the Limitation Act is not extended to writ petitions or incidental applications because writ proceedings are not suits and no rule makes it applicable. The note also states that withdrawal of a writ petition without liberty to refile attracts the principle in Order 23 Rule 1, so a second petition on the same cause of action is barred. The overall procedural framework therefore favours finality and prevents repeated writ filings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195909