https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195908 Affidavits for Article 226 writ proceedings must be verified and filed in the manner prescribed by the Court's rules; a notarial affirmation alone is not sufficient unless those rules expressly allow it or the Court directs otherwise. Although a Notary Public may administer oaths and take affidavits for notarial purposes under the Notaries Act, 1952, that power does not automatically make such affidavits valid for writ practice. Sections 139 and 141 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 were not treated as validating the affidavit for this purpose. The notarial affidavit was therefore not a proper affidavit for the proceeding. en-us Mon, 06 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Nov 2017 12:15:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195908 Affidavits for Article 226 writ proceedings must be verified and filed in the manner prescribed by the Court's rules; a notarial affirmation alone is not sufficient unless those rules expressly allow it or the Court directs otherwise. Although a Notary Public may administer oaths and take affidavits for notarial purposes under the Notaries Act, 1952, that power does not automatically make such affidavits valid for writ practice. Sections 139 and 141 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 were not treated as validating the affidavit for this purpose. The notarial affidavit was therefore not a proper affidavit for the proceeding. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195908