<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 738 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350859</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order, which sought to justify marking to market loss as business expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found no substantial question of law, citing a previous decision that had conclusively settled the issue. The appellant&#039;s attempt to distinguish a prior Apex Court decision was unsuccessful, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 04:42:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 738 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350859</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order, which sought to justify marking to market loss as business expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found no substantial question of law, citing a previous decision that had conclusively settled the issue. The appellant&#039;s attempt to distinguish a prior Apex Court decision was unsuccessful, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>