<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 734 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350855</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to make an ad-hoc addition of Rs. 5 Lac while deleting the trading addition of Rs. 73,94,581/-. The Tribunal found that the rejection of the books of account under Section 145(3) was not justified as the assessee had maintained proper records, and the decline in the GP rate was reasonably explained. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 04:41:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 734 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350855</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to make an ad-hoc addition of Rs. 5 Lac while deleting the trading addition of Rs. 73,94,581/-. The Tribunal found that the rejection of the books of account under Section 145(3) was not justified as the assessee had maintained proper records, and the decline in the GP rate was reasonably explained. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>