<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 727 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350848</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal erred in upholding the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income. The Court agreed with the CIT(A) that the penalty was unjustified as it was based on estimation without concrete evidence of concealment. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was overturned, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 04:41:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 727 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350848</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal erred in upholding the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income. The Court agreed with the CIT(A) that the penalty was unjustified as it was based on estimation without concrete evidence of concealment. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was overturned, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>