<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 725 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350846</link>
    <description>The department challenged the Tribunal&#039;s judgment on the import of a machine under the EPCG license, seeking treatment as a 100% oriented unit. The Court addressed substantial questions of law regarding Customs Act provisions, duty implications, import processes, warehousing, license cancellations, and show cause notices. Disagreements over authorities&#039; observations and the Commissioner&#039;s post-remand stance complicated the case. The Tribunal directed reconsideration based on a Board circular, ultimately allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal. The judgment dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, instructed on goods release, and outlined potential auction procedures if needed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 16:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 725 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350846</link>
      <description>The department challenged the Tribunal&#039;s judgment on the import of a machine under the EPCG license, seeking treatment as a 100% oriented unit. The Court addressed substantial questions of law regarding Customs Act provisions, duty implications, import processes, warehousing, license cancellations, and show cause notices. Disagreements over authorities&#039; observations and the Commissioner&#039;s post-remand stance complicated the case. The Tribunal directed reconsideration based on a Board circular, ultimately allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal. The judgment dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, instructed on goods release, and outlined potential auction procedures if needed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>