https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350841 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to reject the appellant's claim for remission of duty on goods destroyed in a fire accident. The Court found that the Tribunal's reliance on the insurance claim value as evidence of the goods lost was reasonable, and there was no additional evidence presented to support further loss beyond the approved claim. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal's decision on the remission of duty based on the insurance claim value of the destroyed goods. en-us Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Nov 2017 04:40:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350841 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to reject the appellant's claim for remission of duty on goods destroyed in a fire accident. The Court found that the Tribunal's reliance on the insurance claim value as evidence of the goods lost was reasonable, and there was no additional evidence presented to support further loss beyond the approved claim. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal's decision on the remission of duty based on the insurance claim value of the destroyed goods. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350841