<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 714 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350835</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the service tax demand and penalty for services provided to non-commercial Government buildings and cleaning services. The demand for Commercial and Industrial Construction Service was partially upheld, with certain construction services deemed taxable. The penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, was set aside due to the appellant&#039;s partial payment and the interpretation of the law. The appeal was partly allowed based on these findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2017 15:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 714 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350835</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the service tax demand and penalty for services provided to non-commercial Government buildings and cleaning services. The demand for Commercial and Industrial Construction Service was partially upheld, with certain construction services deemed taxable. The penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, was set aside due to the appellant&#039;s partial payment and the interpretation of the law. The appeal was partly allowed based on these findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>