<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 700 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350821</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the duty demand, interest, and penalties imposed on the appellants for alleged clandestine clearance of finish goods without duty payment. The tribunal found discrepancies in raw material stock but emphasized the need for proper physical verification and cross-examination of witnesses for fair adjudication. The case was remanded back to the adjudicating authority to ensure all issues are examined thoroughly and procedural fairness is upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 04:38:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 700 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350821</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the duty demand, interest, and penalties imposed on the appellants for alleged clandestine clearance of finish goods without duty payment. The tribunal found discrepancies in raw material stock but emphasized the need for proper physical verification and cross-examination of witnesses for fair adjudication. The case was remanded back to the adjudicating authority to ensure all issues are examined thoroughly and procedural fairness is upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>