<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 697 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350818</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision regarding the clandestine clearance of goods, the manufacturing capacity of stainless steel ingots, and the admissibility of evidence under Section 36B of the Central Excise Act. The final judgment was pronounced on 09.10.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 04:38:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 697 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350818</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision regarding the clandestine clearance of goods, the manufacturing capacity of stainless steel ingots, and the admissibility of evidence under Section 36B of the Central Excise Act. The final judgment was pronounced on 09.10.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>