<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 695 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350816</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of a registered dealer under Service Tax provisions, directing the refund of Rs. 23,13,649/- with interest. The claim was initially rejected based on unjust enrichment, as service tax was included in purchase orders and invoices. However, the Tribunal found that the appellant had paid the tax from their own funds and had not collected it from the principal, thus unjust enrichment did not apply. The Adjudicating Authority was ordered to process the refund within 45 days of receiving the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 04:38:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 695 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350816</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of a registered dealer under Service Tax provisions, directing the refund of Rs. 23,13,649/- with interest. The claim was initially rejected based on unjust enrichment, as service tax was included in purchase orders and invoices. However, the Tribunal found that the appellant had paid the tax from their own funds and had not collected it from the principal, thus unjust enrichment did not apply. The Adjudicating Authority was ordered to process the refund within 45 days of receiving the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>