<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 690 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350811</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the coaching institute did not engage in short payment of service tax as alleged. Pre-school coaching activities were found non-taxable under the law. Test series activities were also deemed non-taxable as they did not involve coaching or training. Sale of books was not subject to service tax. Discrepancies in receipts based on the imprest account were considered unfounded. The appeals were allowed, the order was set aside, and the appellants were entitled to consequential benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 690 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350811</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the coaching institute did not engage in short payment of service tax as alleged. Pre-school coaching activities were found non-taxable under the law. Test series activities were also deemed non-taxable as they did not involve coaching or training. Sale of books was not subject to service tax. Discrepancies in receipts based on the imprest account were considered unfounded. The appeals were allowed, the order was set aside, and the appellants were entitled to consequential benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>