<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1295 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195889</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal on all three issues, emphasizing the importance of consistency in applying legal provisions and factual findings across similar cases to maintain coherence and fairness in judgments. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the project&#039;s connection to a larger approved project and the pro rata claim of deduction were rejected due to previous consistent Tribunal decisions on similar matters. Additionally, the Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the violation of commercial area provisions, citing precedent and the need for uniformity in legal interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 21:50:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1295 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195889</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal on all three issues, emphasizing the importance of consistency in applying legal provisions and factual findings across similar cases to maintain coherence and fairness in judgments. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the project&#039;s connection to a larger approved project and the pro rata claim of deduction were rejected due to previous consistent Tribunal decisions on similar matters. Additionally, the Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the violation of commercial area provisions, citing precedent and the need for uniformity in legal interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>