<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1385 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195890</link>
    <description>The court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee on both issues regarding eligibility for deductions under Section 80P(2)(a)(iv) and Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The department&#039;s contentions were rejected, and the assessee&#039;s claims were allowed based on relevant case law interpretations. The court affirmed that the assessee was entitled to the deductions as per the provisions of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 21:50:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1385 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195890</link>
      <description>The court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee on both issues regarding eligibility for deductions under Section 80P(2)(a)(iv) and Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The department&#039;s contentions were rejected, and the assessee&#039;s claims were allowed based on relevant case law interpretations. The court affirmed that the assessee was entitled to the deductions as per the provisions of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>