https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195892 Review jurisdiction requires a demonstrable error, particularly an apparent error on the face of the impugned order, before an earlier decision can be reopened or corrected. Applying that standard, the SC examined the impugned order and found no error, much less any apparent error. As the threshold for review was not met, the review petitions did not warrant interference and were dismissed. en-us Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Nov 2017 21:50:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195892 Review jurisdiction requires a demonstrable error, particularly an apparent error on the face of the impugned order, before an earlier decision can be reopened or corrected. Applying that standard, the SC examined the impugned order and found no error, much less any apparent error. As the threshold for review was not met, the review petitions did not warrant interference and were dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195892