<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1384 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195878</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A) order and directed the Assessing Officer to compute the commission income at 0.15% instead of 2%, following precedents. The decision ensured fairness in income computation, emphasizing consistency and reasonableness in assessing commission income. The appellant was granted a fair opportunity to be heard, with the decision for the assessment year 2009-10 upheld and applied to other assessment years with similar circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 21:50:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1384 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195878</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A) order and directed the Assessing Officer to compute the commission income at 0.15% instead of 2%, following precedents. The decision ensured fairness in income computation, emphasizing consistency and reasonableness in assessing commission income. The appellant was granted a fair opportunity to be heard, with the decision for the assessment year 2009-10 upheld and applied to other assessment years with similar circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>