<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1129 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195879</link>
    <description>The I.T.A.T. allowed both appeals, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Years 2004-05 &amp;amp; 2008-09. The decision was based on the similarity to previous cases where penalties were deleted, emphasizing the distinction between quantum proceedings and penalty imposition. The commission income assessment on an estimate basis did not warrant penalty, following precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 21:50:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1129 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195879</link>
      <description>The I.T.A.T. allowed both appeals, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Years 2004-05 &amp;amp; 2008-09. The decision was based on the similarity to previous cases where penalties were deleted, emphasizing the distinction between quantum proceedings and penalty imposition. The commission income assessment on an estimate basis did not warrant penalty, following precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>