<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 68 - UTTARANCHAL High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10571</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the &#039;off-period&#039; salary paid to a non-resident technician working in India was taxable in India under section 9(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act. The court emphasized that the off period was integral to the technician&#039;s work in India, making the income earned during that period subject to Indian taxation. The court ruled in favor of the Department, dismissing the appeal with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 08:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 68 - UTTARANCHAL High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10571</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the &#039;off-period&#039; salary paid to a non-resident technician working in India was taxable in India under section 9(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act. The court emphasized that the off period was integral to the technician&#039;s work in India, making the income earned during that period subject to Indian taxation. The court ruled in favor of the Department, dismissing the appeal with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>