<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 46 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10568</link>
    <description>Delayed receipt of export proceeds under section 80HHC(2)(a) required fresh consideration where the assessee explained the delay by reference to industry slackness, financial crisis and the Asian currency crisis. The Court found the rejection order unduly rigid because it demanded proof beyond the explanation already on record, despite materials suggesting delay beyond the assessee&#039;s control. The impugned order was set aside and the application was remitted to the Commissioner for reconsideration in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 46 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10568</link>
      <description>Delayed receipt of export proceeds under section 80HHC(2)(a) required fresh consideration where the assessee explained the delay by reference to industry slackness, financial crisis and the Asian currency crisis. The Court found the rejection order unduly rigid because it demanded proof beyond the explanation already on record, despite materials suggesting delay beyond the assessee&#039;s control. The impugned order was set aside and the application was remitted to the Commissioner for reconsideration in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>