https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195867 The court set aside a judgment regarding LPG distributorship eligibility criteria due to a significant delay by a respondent in challenging the decision. The respondent's failure to promptly contest the grant of dealership to another candidate affected equitable considerations, leading to the court's decision in favor of the appellant without costs. The case underscores the importance of timely legal actions in such matters and the need to consider substantial investments and infrastructure involved in distributorship agreements. en-us Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195867 The court set aside a judgment regarding LPG distributorship eligibility criteria due to a significant delay by a respondent in challenging the decision. The respondent's failure to promptly contest the grant of dealership to another candidate affected equitable considerations, leading to the court's decision in favor of the appellant without costs. The case underscores the importance of timely legal actions in such matters and the need to consider substantial investments and infrastructure involved in distributorship agreements. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195867