<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (8) TMI 326 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195865</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant&#039;s grievance of incorrect pay fixation was a continuing wrong, entitling him to seek proper pay throughout his tenure. The Court emphasized the ongoing nature of the claim for correct salary and remitted the matter to the Tribunal for fresh consideration. It clarified that issues of limitation for consequential reliefs and arrears should be separately determined. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:35:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (8) TMI 326 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195865</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant&#039;s grievance of incorrect pay fixation was a continuing wrong, entitling him to seek proper pay throughout his tenure. The Court emphasized the ongoing nature of the claim for correct salary and remitted the matter to the Tribunal for fresh consideration. It clarified that issues of limitation for consequential reliefs and arrears should be separately determined. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>