<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 75 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10566</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition challenging the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order on the validity of issuing a notice under section 143(2) after a refund order. It emphasized the importance of consistency in judicial decisions and upheld the petitioner&#039;s argument, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order. The court also rejected the dismissal of the writ petition based on an alternative remedy, highlighting the need for a thorough examination of the issues raised. Additionally, the judgment addressed the duty of the Tribunal to resolve conflicting views under section 255(4) to maintain clarity and consistency in legal decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 75 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10566</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition challenging the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order on the validity of issuing a notice under section 143(2) after a refund order. It emphasized the importance of consistency in judicial decisions and upheld the petitioner&#039;s argument, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order. The court also rejected the dismissal of the writ petition based on an alternative remedy, highlighting the need for a thorough examination of the issues raised. Additionally, the judgment addressed the duty of the Tribunal to resolve conflicting views under section 255(4) to maintain clarity and consistency in legal decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>