<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 495 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195862</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the respondents were restrained from holding the E.G.M. on 2-3-1995 unless they fully complied with the legal requirements. The court emphasized the importance of full disclosure of material facts to shareholders, as mandated by Section 173 of the Companies Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:18:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 495 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195862</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the respondents were restrained from holding the E.G.M. on 2-3-1995 unless they fully complied with the legal requirements. The court emphasized the importance of full disclosure of material facts to shareholders, as mandated by Section 173 of the Companies Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>