<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 73 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10565</link>
    <description>The court held that the firms were not sole selling agents as per Section 294(2) of the Companies Act, 1956. It found the appointments of selling agents violated Section 314(1)(b) and were invalid without a special resolution. Therefore, commission payments were disallowed as business expenditure under Section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 73 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10565</link>
      <description>The court held that the firms were not sole selling agents as per Section 294(2) of the Companies Act, 1956. It found the appointments of selling agents violated Section 314(1)(b) and were invalid without a special resolution. Therefore, commission payments were disallowed as business expenditure under Section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>