<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 677 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350798</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the issue of disallowance of expenses related to exempt income under section 14A back to the Assessing Officer for verification, holding that no disallowance could be made for investments held as stock-in-trade. Adhoc disallowances on specific expenses like computer software and conveyance were upheld as the assessee failed to substantiate the expenses. The appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes, maintaining the adhoc disallowances made by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 11:47:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 677 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350798</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the issue of disallowance of expenses related to exempt income under section 14A back to the Assessing Officer for verification, holding that no disallowance could be made for investments held as stock-in-trade. Adhoc disallowances on specific expenses like computer software and conveyance were upheld as the assessee failed to substantiate the expenses. The appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes, maintaining the adhoc disallowances made by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>