https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350786 The court dismissed all writ petitions challenging the New Shipper Review, ruling that the Designated Authority had jurisdiction to initiate the review under Rule 22. The court clarified that Rule 22 does not specify a time limit for the review, distinguishing it from Rule 23. It held that Rule 23(3) and Rule 17 procedures do not apply to Rule 22. The court deemed the writ petitions not maintainable, directing the petitioner to seek recourse under Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act for further remedy. en-us Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Apr 2018 10:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350786 The court dismissed all writ petitions challenging the New Shipper Review, ruling that the Designated Authority had jurisdiction to initiate the review under Rule 22. The court clarified that Rule 22 does not specify a time limit for the review, distinguishing it from Rule 23. It held that Rule 23(3) and Rule 17 procedures do not apply to Rule 22. The court deemed the writ petitions not maintainable, directing the petitioner to seek recourse under Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act for further remedy. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350786