https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350782 The Delhi High Court, in a judgment by Mr. S. Muralidhar and Ms. Prathiba M. Singh, JJ., clarified that an interim order from 1st April 2016 allowing service tax collection on a reverse charge basis for fees paid to Senior Advocates was effective immediately and applied universally. The Court held that the Department could not demand service tax for the period from 1st April 2016 to 5th June 2016, as it should have been collected on a reverse charge basis. The interim order was made absolute, preventing the Department from raising service tax demands on Senior Advocates during that period. en-us Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Jan 2018 16:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350782 The Delhi High Court, in a judgment by Mr. S. Muralidhar and Ms. Prathiba M. Singh, JJ., clarified that an interim order from 1st April 2016 allowing service tax collection on a reverse charge basis for fees paid to Senior Advocates was effective immediately and applied universally. The Court held that the Department could not demand service tax for the period from 1st April 2016 to 5th June 2016, as it should have been collected on a reverse charge basis. The interim order was made absolute, preventing the Department from raising service tax demands on Senior Advocates during that period. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350782