https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350771 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order confirming the demand for Cenvat Credit. It found no evidence of mala fide intentions or suppression of facts by the appellant, deeming the issue interpretational. The show cause notice invoking the extended period of limitation was deemed not maintainable. Citing a judgment by the Hon'ble Madras High Court, the Tribunal allowed the Cenvat Credit for steel items used in supporting structures, considering the appellant's use of items in manufacturing paper machines. The appellant was found entitled to Cenvat Credit on the specified items. en-us Fri, 06 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Nov 2017 12:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350771 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order confirming the demand for Cenvat Credit. It found no evidence of mala fide intentions or suppression of facts by the appellant, deeming the issue interpretational. The show cause notice invoking the extended period of limitation was deemed not maintainable. Citing a judgment by the Hon'ble Madras High Court, the Tribunal allowed the Cenvat Credit for steel items used in supporting structures, considering the appellant's use of items in manufacturing paper machines. The appellant was found entitled to Cenvat Credit on the specified items. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 06 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350771