<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 647 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350768</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled in favor of the appellant in a dispute over the eligibility of availing credit on input items cleared separately to a client. The Tribunal found that the appellant had acted in good faith, paid the full liability on the cleared inputs, and reversed the credit availed, ensuring no loss to the Government. As the appellant complied with the rules and did not gain any benefit, the Tribunal set aside the order for further recovery of credit, allowing the appeal and emphasizing the bonafide nature of the transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 647 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350768</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled in favor of the appellant in a dispute over the eligibility of availing credit on input items cleared separately to a client. The Tribunal found that the appellant had acted in good faith, paid the full liability on the cleared inputs, and reversed the credit availed, ensuring no loss to the Government. As the appellant complied with the rules and did not gain any benefit, the Tribunal set aside the order for further recovery of credit, allowing the appeal and emphasizing the bonafide nature of the transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>