<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2687 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195848</link>
    <description>The judgment declares the 99th Constitution Amendment Act and the NJAC Act unconstitutional, reinstating the collegium system for judicial appointments and transfers. It emphasizes the importance of maintaining judicial independence and the primacy of the judiciary in appointments. The court calls for a &quot;consequence hearing&quot; to consider enhancing transparency and accountability within the collegium system while upholding the rule of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 14:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2687 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195848</link>
      <description>The judgment declares the 99th Constitution Amendment Act and the NJAC Act unconstitutional, reinstating the collegium system for judicial appointments and transfers. It emphasizes the importance of maintaining judicial independence and the primacy of the judiciary in appointments. The court calls for a &quot;consequence hearing&quot; to consider enhancing transparency and accountability within the collegium system while upholding the rule of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>