<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1265 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195852</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the grant of interest on the refund claim amount by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal found that the issue was settled law based on the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in the case of Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd, which favored the appellant. Therefore, the Tribunal held that the grant of interest on the refund claim amount was warranted, and there was no merit in the Revenue&#039;s case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 09:53:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1265 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195852</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the grant of interest on the refund claim amount by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal found that the issue was settled law based on the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in the case of Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd, which favored the appellant. Therefore, the Tribunal held that the grant of interest on the refund claim amount was warranted, and there was no merit in the Revenue&#039;s case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>