<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1128 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195842</link>
    <description>The High Court noted that the petitioner&#039;s claim for interest on a refund had not been considered. On the respondent&#039;s statement that the claim would be examined in accordance with law, the court directed respondent No. 5 to consider and decide the claim within two months of receiving a copy of the order. The petitioner was directed to furnish the order copy to enable such consideration, and the petition was disposed of on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 09:53:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1128 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195842</link>
      <description>The High Court noted that the petitioner&#039;s claim for interest on a refund had not been considered. On the respondent&#039;s statement that the claim would be examined in accordance with law, the court directed respondent No. 5 to consider and decide the claim within two months of receiving a copy of the order. The petitioner was directed to furnish the order copy to enable such consideration, and the petition was disposed of on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>