<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Assessee Not Required to Prove Negative Onus in NSEL Dispute; No Evidence of Sham Transactions Found.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36850</link>
    <description>Rejection of books of accounts - There cannot be negative onus on assessee to prove it has not made purchases from NSEL in dispute. No evidence of any sham purchases/transactions have been brought on record. No evidence of any purchase made by assessee from NSEL have been brought on record. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2017 21:43:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2017 21:43:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Assessee Not Required to Prove Negative Onus in NSEL Dispute; No Evidence of Sham Transactions Found.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36850</link>
      <description>Rejection of books of accounts - There cannot be negative onus on assessee to prove it has not made purchases from NSEL in dispute. No evidence of any sham purchases/transactions have been brought on record. No evidence of any purchase made by assessee from NSEL have been brought on record. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2017 21:43:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>