<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 67 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10542</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow depreciation on plant and machinery of a vegetable ghee unit, despite not being actively used for the full relevant year. The court relied on the interpretation of section 32 of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing that depreciation should be granted if the asset is owned by the assessee and intended for business use. Precedents were cited to support depreciation on assets kept ready for use, leading to a favorable judgment for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 67 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10542</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow depreciation on plant and machinery of a vegetable ghee unit, despite not being actively used for the full relevant year. The court relied on the interpretation of section 32 of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing that depreciation should be granted if the asset is owned by the assessee and intended for business use. Precedents were cited to support depreciation on assets kept ready for use, leading to a favorable judgment for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>