<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 951 - COMPANY LAW BOARD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195827</link>
    <description>The Company Law Board (CLB) found that the alleged oppressive allotment of shares by the OPA group without proper resolutions was invalid. The RMS group retained their rights as shareholders, with no evidence of abandonment. The CLB directed a general meeting to reconstitute the board based on shareholding as of October 2003, allowing for a fair valuation mechanism for share buyouts to resolve the dispute equitably.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2017 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 951 - COMPANY LAW BOARD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195827</link>
      <description>The Company Law Board (CLB) found that the alleged oppressive allotment of shares by the OPA group without proper resolutions was invalid. The RMS group retained their rights as shareholders, with no evidence of abandonment. The CLB directed a general meeting to reconstitute the board based on shareholding as of October 2003, allowing for a fair valuation mechanism for share buyouts to resolve the dispute equitably.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>