https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195826 Revisional interference with a discharge order was refused because the prosecution material did not disclose a prima facie case for conviction. The Delhi High Court accepted that the alleged recovery lacked corroboration, as there was no panch witness and no independent evidence connecting the scooter to the accused. It also treated the Section 108 Customs Act statements as unreliable in light of allegations of coercion and medical circumstances casting doubt on voluntariness. On that record, the discharge order was upheld and the challenge failed. en-us Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Nov 2017 11:22:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195826 Revisional interference with a discharge order was refused because the prosecution material did not disclose a prima facie case for conviction. The Delhi High Court accepted that the alleged recovery lacked corroboration, as there was no panch witness and no independent evidence connecting the scooter to the accused. It also treated the Section 108 Customs Act statements as unreliable in light of allegations of coercion and medical circumstances casting doubt on voluntariness. On that record, the discharge order was upheld and the challenge failed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195826