<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 640 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350761</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the grounds related to the disallowance of vehicle running and maintenance expenses, traveling expenses, and the enhancement of income due to the repayment of the car loan. However, it allowed the appeal for statistical purposes regarding the purchase of jewelry, directing the A.O. to verify the payment through the bank statement. The appeal was thus partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2017 10:55:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 640 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350761</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the grounds related to the disallowance of vehicle running and maintenance expenses, traveling expenses, and the enhancement of income due to the repayment of the car loan. However, it allowed the appeal for statistical purposes regarding the purchase of jewelry, directing the A.O. to verify the payment through the bank statement. The appeal was thus partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>