<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 628 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350749</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh determination, directing the assessee to substantiate material purchases and reconcile them with sales. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of proving the genuineness of transactions and providing evidence of purchases and sales. The appeals for both assessment years were allowed for statistical purposes, with instructions for the AO to re-evaluate the issues in compliance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2017 10:55:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 628 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350749</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh determination, directing the assessee to substantiate material purchases and reconcile them with sales. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of proving the genuineness of transactions and providing evidence of purchases and sales. The appeals for both assessment years were allowed for statistical purposes, with instructions for the AO to re-evaluate the issues in compliance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>