<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 619 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350740</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, confirming the confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties under the Customs Act, 1962. The penalties were upheld against various appellants involved in the illegal import and clearance of goods, emphasizing the seriousness of smuggling. Departmental appeals against dropping penalties on certain individuals were dismissed due to insufficient evidence, granting them the benefit of doubt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2017 10:54:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 619 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350740</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, confirming the confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties under the Customs Act, 1962. The penalties were upheld against various appellants involved in the illegal import and clearance of goods, emphasizing the seriousness of smuggling. Departmental appeals against dropping penalties on certain individuals were dismissed due to insufficient evidence, granting them the benefit of doubt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>