<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 617 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350738</link>
    <description>Where a grievance concerning offshore accounts, unaccounted foreign funds and related market manipulation was already covered by an existing court-monitored investigative framework, no further supervisory direction was necessary. The Special Investigation Team had been constituted earlier to examine unaccounted monies kept in foreign bank accounts and related unlawful activity, while the Multi Agency Group was coordinating and monitoring investigations arising from the Panama Papers disclosures. As the concern raised in the petition was already being addressed through these mechanisms, the request for additional directions was declined and the petition was disposed of against the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2017 10:53:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 617 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350738</link>
      <description>Where a grievance concerning offshore accounts, unaccounted foreign funds and related market manipulation was already covered by an existing court-monitored investigative framework, no further supervisory direction was necessary. The Special Investigation Team had been constituted earlier to examine unaccounted monies kept in foreign bank accounts and related unlawful activity, while the Multi Agency Group was coordinating and monitoring investigations arising from the Panama Papers disclosures. As the concern raised in the petition was already being addressed through these mechanisms, the request for additional directions was declined and the petition was disposed of against the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>